last updated: july 10, 2005
well, winnie and andy have gotten me into be a food critic. for
winnie's reference of in-depth (non-vegetarian) reviews check out winnie's
food page. also, visit boston.citysearch.com for
addresses and hours.
*** = highly recommended
* = recently added
on the to do list ... in search of the best thai ...
i've been back to great bay several times in the past few months (6/2004). one time i had a vegetarian plate, which consisted of four sides. one was a sort of asian-esque vegetable mixture which was okay. another was just roasted vegetables (zz). the really good one though and which was definitely worth getting was the pasta (gnocchi i think) w/ morels. mm. we got the chocolate plate for dessert, which consisted of various bits, including some mousse type of thing and such.
the last time i went to great bay i had the seaweed salad again (which is still good), and then i thought what the heck why not try the mushroom risotto. it was good but didn't bowl me over, prob. due to the fact that it's mushroom risotto and every other place in the world has it these days. the rice beer we got was good.
oleana (134 hampshire, near kendall and inman sq). ana sortun's mediterranean-influenced restaurant. anyway, we were outside in the surprisingly large back and it was a great setting, although rather cold. i had the vegetarian tasting menu. here's the food porn channel run down [actually i started writing this and found my memory to be woefully lacking. then i got the bright idea to look up the menu online.] 1) a little lump of pureed carrot (but more like finely grated, dense and chilled) w/ an "egyptian" spice mixture + a little lump of "armenian bean and walnut pâté" w/ homemade string cheese on the side. the bean and walnut thing was kind of dense and chewy. kind of weird. 2) the salad special. mostly arugula, roasted fennel (mm), and peaches. what can you say? it was a salad. 3) a side from one of the day's specials. olive puree w/ sugar snap peas (mm), something green (i forget. cress maybe?), and a bit of potato puree. 4) another side from one of the day's specials. filo wrapped around a roasted red pepper and corn mixture. side of fresh corn in a creamy sauce. 5) two little breaded cheese thingies. the dessert it came w/ wasn't so great. i forget what it was exactly; some sort of white nougat thing. but we also had this bing cherry granita w/ crème fraîche that was good. not too sweet. one of the better desserts i've had. all in all, this one's def a keeper. (btw, 3 of the 4 people i went w/ had the steak special, which they said was great.) i was reminded that i haven't been back to casablanca; i should check that out again as well.
hamersley's (south end on tremont st): andy and i go here pretty regularly; it's def. our fav. place in the south end. they have a good vegetarian selection: they always have a vegetarian tasting menu, as well as noteworthy appetizers and sides (including a great "mashed potato cake" and a mushroom/garlic sandwich. here are some notes from previous visits: 9/04: got the mushroom sandwich again, which was again quite excellent. nice and garlicky. also had this baked penne in a cream sauce which was good although a little plain. the major drawback w/ that dish was that it was way too hot temperature-wise. i had to wait at least five minutes before i could eat it w/ out scalding my tongue.
went again (6/04): mmm. i had the wild mushroom soup w/ white truffle oil which was very mushroom-y. i also had buttery/lemon spinach noodles w/ white asparagus which had a bit of sheep's milk cheese, spinach, and some nice little bits of some type of strong, earthy mushroom. andy had the tuna which he said was great, and it came w/ this beet "cake" (basically three layers of beet with goat cheese in between) that, surprisingly in a good way, had mustard on it. for dessert we had the orange meringue which i thought had a hint of sesame but which andy didn't taste. the meringue was fine, but nothing extraordinary.
number 9 park (near the state house). 8/2004: the time before this time was the best time i'd ever been there. i had the corn and black truffle "terrine" dish which turned out to be this interesting small rectangular plate with three or so gelatinous long rectangles ("prisms" would prob. be the nerdy correct geometrical term) spread out down the plate, drizzled with black truffle oil and shavings with some bits of real corn thrown in. tasty and one of the more entertaining dishes i've had in a while. i also had a very nice tortelloni with pea shoots and morels. mmm. andy had the lobster gnocchi. for dessert we had the rosewater creme brulee. note to self: avoid food with flowers in them. i always get them thinking they'll be kind of fun, and i just end up feeling like i've just accidentally swallowed a bottle of foot lotion from the body shop or something.
this time around i got fries (haha) and olives (what can i say? i felt like having it MY way). the olives were good, although they were drenched in olive oil which i know most people prob. like but which, as i told andy, i see as being like putting peanuts on a peanut butter sandwich or topping your doritos with cheese whiz. i like my olives unadorned. naked, if you will. haha. anyway, the fetuccini with chanterelles was disappointing. andy was also not so thrilled with his skate with lemon aioli (the special). speaking of the aioli, i also had lemon ailoi with my fries which is generally not a bad thing except this was like lemon FROSTING, which was not appetizing. and it took forever (as in i was more than 1/2way done eating my fries) for the waiter to bring me some ketchup. grr.
so all in all this gives number 9 park a batting average of about 1 in 4 for me, although andy points out that we've been sitting in the front, and next time we should try harder to sit at the bar so we can get both the dinner and the bar menus. although something that i still can't understand is why you can't have both menus wherever you sit. maybe winnie can explain this to me. and one more observation: the last two waiters we've had at number 9 park have both been extremely chirpy. is this the effect that they're consciously striving for? do they have pep talks before every evening, where they all stand in a circle and chant, "PEP! PEP! PEP! yeeeeeeaaaaaah, PEP!" i can only imagine. i know i'm not alone in having the firm belief that a good waiter should be able to pick up in the first minute of interaction whether or not his clientele want him to make annoying chit-chat. i = a misanthrope, so let me eat in peace, please. it wouldn't be so bad if they were more attentive, but i've found that as in most places there is no correlation between #9 park's waiters' annoyingness and their attentiveness. ah well.
via matta (back bay near arlington st). run by the same people who did radius and great bay. the appetizer i got, the crispy eggplant, was amazing, which i think is the first time i've ever been able to say that about pretty much anything i've gotten from any place i've ever been (with the exception of dok bua, haha). it was eggplant, but smooth and soft (but not mushy) and suprisingly delectable. the eggplant was covered with a crunchy bready crust, a light, savory tomato mixture, and thin slices of mozarella, i think. unfortunately, the rest of the meal was as boring as usual. the only vegetarian entrees they had were a spaghetti dish and a ravioli dish. zzzzzzzzz. instead i opted for a plate of sides, none of which were worth mentioning. patty got the ravioli and it looked even more boring than what i had. andy, mark, and patty all had salads (andy's was radicchio and prosciutto), which were all right but not particularly noteworthy. mark had the calamari as well, which he quite liked, and clams for his entree. andy had a pasta with chanterelles and guinea hen, which he said was fine but also not stunning. for dessert we shared the watermelon granita and the rice cake, both of which were good. our table also had several glasses of a dinner tokay which was also good.
went again recently (april 2004). seemed to have more vegetarian stuff than last time i went. i had the minestra which was chockful of nice veggies in a savory but understated broth. i also had the crispy eggplant again, and though it wasn't quite as smooth as before it was still quite good, and the tomatoes were nice and fresh. both appetizers were quite big and overall very good. oh, and the olive oil they have is nice and grassy. heh. andy had the arugula salad and the homemade ravioli. i'm probably likely to go back here sooner than most others.
the rialto (harvard square). not bad. had a really dull redleaf salad and a vegetable dish they whipped up. the vegetable dish would've been rather boring, but they had a lot of different types of interesting mushrooms, all of which were quite tasty. i should learn more about mushrooms, i think. the people i went with said their food was about average. our desserts weren't bad. i forget exactly who had what, but there was a whisky-ish (?) custard that was interesting and a maple walnut ice cream that was pretty good. i don't know anything about the place, but i get the impression it's rather standard, not particularly adventurous.
troquet: everyone i went with got the beet salad. i think i might have had this before, and it was quite good. big and straightforward. i'd had the mushroom cavatelli about two years ago and it was definitely not so good this time around. andy had the game pigeon which he said was only about average. all in all the place is a bit overpriced, and you're much better off at number 9 park.
central kitchen (mass ave in central sq) w/ andy. the service was subpar. you know it's a bad sign when your server forgets to tell you the specials. anyway, andy had the roast duck which he said was good but a bit overpriced for what it was. i had the stuffed sweet onion. it was in a creamy goat cheese sauce with a mostly artichoke/asparagus mixture and came on a bed of "fregola", which according to formaggiokitchen.com is "a grain sized toasted pasta from Sardinia". all in all it was better than most vegetarian things i get, although it wasn't that fantastic.
scollay square (21 beacon st, beacon hill): kind of new place next door to where my friend roy lives. we went on a sunday and it was pretty empty. i got a really good, albeit simple, portabella sandwich with cress and goat cheese. roy had a spinach and goat cheese omelette and andy had eggs and hash. andy wasn't impressed w/ what he got but said he'd be up for trying it for dinner. in any case both of us have decided that we need to try some of the places in beacon hill seeing as how we've pretty much run out of ones in the south end.
sonsie (newbury st near mass ave): been a lot of times. not that bad, actually, although the food is quite heavy and lacks subtlety. only go if you really want to eat in that area or if you really want to be one of those annoying people that sit in the front when the weather's nice.
metropolis cafe (south end on tremont st): see entry below under avoid at all costs
aquitaine (south end on tremont st). i've been twice. the first time andy and i both agreed that the food was really salty. the second time around was slightly better. for starts we had an endive/watercress/walnut/apple/blue cheese salad which was good although it was about 99% endive and 1% watercress (where can i go to just get a good watercress salad??) and a leek/asparagus tart with goat cheese. the leeks and asparagus were fine, but the tart itself was a little hard. andy had the salmon which came w/ this really heavy thick sauce. he said his dish was quite salty, yet again. i had the goat cheese ravioli which was actually rather bland. it came w/ bits of vegetable in a mostly olive oil sauce, i think, and with a bit of lemon. all in all sort of dull. andy said that the past few times he's gone to aquitaine (w/out me) his food was fine and not salty ... hmm. winnie sez a place that pricy needs to be consistent, and i completely agree.
the nightingale (south end on tremont). i've been here once for a very mediocre brunch once and andy's been there for a good dinner and we both went for a quite ordinary dinner. i started with a mushroom tart which came with some overly oily watercress with huge leaves. the tart was good, but not amazing. i really didn't want to get mushroom risotto AGAIN which, like so many other restaurants, was their only vegetarian entree, so instead i got a plate of sides. the couscous was really weird. usually couscous is small, but this was sort of engorged and chewy as well as quite bland. the butternut squash puree was ordinary and the plentiful escarole rather salty. the fingerling potatoes were good, though, but they tend to be pretty foolproof. andy had the pork chop which he readily demolished although again it wasn't anything special.
cuchi cuchi (main st in central sq close to tosci's). we went on the fourth of july, and it was pretty empty. andy liked what he had, which included lamb stuffed grape leaves and some veal tartare thing i think. i liked the grilled asparagus i had, but their version of the ubiquitous mushroom risotto wasn't so good, nor was their potato gratin. the dessert, banana bread with vanilla ice cream, was also fairly mediocre. the olive spread for the bread was pretty good, though. our waiter was annoying. all in all i guess i wouldn't mind going back again; didn't get a chance to try their "white gazpacho" soup this time.
tremont 647 (south end on tremont close to dartmouth): see entry below under avoid at all costs
spire (tremont st at park st): the one line summary is: okay food, terrible service. see the 11/17/2004 blog entry on this page for details. overall the service was amateur and it felt like the staff didn't want to be there. with all the disappointment in the service, it's hardly with mentioning the food, but here's a quick run-down:
- vidalia onion soup, pickled chanterelles, nantucket razor clams & scallion: andy said this was good but the ratio of soup to other stuff was off (possibly the waitress's fault).
- kobe beef shooters, 3 rare burgers with 3 different toppings: andy said the beef was really good. the toppings remain a mystery though (see above).
- pickled lemon & 3 basil salad, marcona almonds & almond oil: very good actually. salted on purpose, although i found it to be overly so.
- potato gnocchi, local tomatoes, basil pistou, & ricotta salata: not bad, but uninteresting. definitely way better than metropolis's slug-like gnocchi. incidentally, andy went back there once and they were still serving that bizarre molded asparagus dish. so weird.
dok bua (harvard ave). def. get the tofu gra prow. it's soooo good. it's this textured bean curd and looks kind of like beef.
comments from other visits: the pad thai is a little sweet, but good. their vegetables are always nice and fresh. for lunch you can get combinations. i had the red curry w/ tofu and andy had the pad kee mow. both of our dishes came w/ two appetizers. the main dish was about 1/3 the size of a dinner portion, but in total it was a nice amount for only $6. ridiculously cheap. the thing about this place is that the food usually isn't incredibly different than stuff you might get elsewhere in terms of how they put it together, but the end result is -good-. i don't know what little things they do differently, but their food is definitely better than any other thai place around. for dessert they gave us this funny gloopy, gelatinous thing that had bits of corn and chewy bubbles that tasted like sweet rice. no idea what the heck it was, but geez, asian desserts are definitely not asian food's strong point.
chilli duck (on boylston directly across from the pru): americanized for the most part, but better than most. also has a separate authentic thai menu; andy likes crispy pork with peppercorns.
bangkok blue (boylston across from the BPL). they have this spicy tofu dish there that i quite like, although it has quite a few things i gen don't like, inc. bamboo shoots, cashews, and baby corn. but in this dish i like it all. so far this place is near the top of my fav thai places, more out of default than anything else. need to try more outside of my 1 mile radius. not sure how authentic it is, but a thai guy i knew said he thought pad thai on boylston near mass ave was the most authentic. i think that place is pretty good, but it's rather fast foody. a big menu, though.
speaking of thai places, i have a tendency to revisit places i didn't like before to give them a second chance, but when i go i'm usu reminded of why i didn't like them in the first place. case in point, thai dish on newbury close to deluca's. i mean, there's nothing extraordinarily bad about it, but it's quite mediocre. bangkok city on mass ave near berklee has a better than average decor, but the food itself is about as mediocre as thai dish. also, the thai place in central square (i forget the name) is bland, but if you can get past thinking of it as really americanized thai it's actually pretty decent.
thai village (592 tremont st): see entry below under avoid at all costs
buddha's delight (chinatown). this is the place that is completely vegetarian and serves mock pork, chicken, beef, pretty much everything you can think of. last time i went i got the "chicken fingers" as an appetizer which consisted of regular tofu in a corn dog-like fried batter with a sweet and sour sauce that strangely tasted like applesauce. that wasn't so good, but the entree made up for it; it was "spicy beef" and reminded me a lot of the tofu gra prow at dok bua (see below), but with less depth. still, it was a decent meal and better than the average chinese restaurant in boston (not sure about in chinatown though). it's nice to be able to order anything on the menu although the place was a tad pricey.
hsin hsin (mass ave near beacon st and the harvard bridge). recently (2005) renovated and now under new management. unfortunately, now it's pretty much completely generic and although less greasy, much more bland. i'm going to have to go to pu pu hot pot (in central square near tosci's) now to get my greasy chinese goodness fix.
king fung garden (chinatown on kneeland st). aka brezhnev's. this is a popular TEP eatery. they specialize in northern chinese food, so it's mostly noodle-based. super greasy, but not bad. their scallion pancake is quite good.
the tibetan place (central sq on pearl st). this was
my first time eating tibetan food and i found it to be quite bland,
and the cilantro was a little too pervasive for my taste. even though
my dish was spicy (a tofu vegetable dish), it was the kind of spicy
where they just throw in some really hot peppers, i.e. it didn't
really penetrate the dish. we also got some fried potato/mushroom
balls (w/ cilantro) which were pretty good, some steamed buns (which
catfoo says is very chinese), and our food came w/ a little plate of
oiled halved cherry tomatoes with onions and a little plate of
cucumbers lightly covered in a sort of creamy sauce. catfoo had
noodles (i forget what kind) with vegetables, but the noodles were
really rather tasteless. she said the other type of noodles they have
are better. all in all it was interesting, although i prob. won't be
trying tibetan food again for a while.
buddha's delight (in chinatown, also one in brookline on harvard ave): all vegetarian w/ many vegetarian meat substitutes. has novelty, but in general the food's not that great and it's more hit or miss than average.
mary chung's (on mass. ave. in central square): mediocre, but okay every once in a while.
MIT food trucks: super cheap, although not particularly distinctive food. i lived off of this stuff for almost four years. i'm kind of surprised my arteries survived it.
best: the only indian restaurant that really deserves to be in
this category is *** himalaya, which used to be on the corner
of mass. ave and newbury st. but unfortunately is no longer
around. the food there was fantastic; it always had distinct and fresh
flavours and never felt heavy or greasy.
india samraat (on mass. ave. near beacon) was an early favorite
when i first came to boston with its mid-priced food, although it's a
little heavy. overall i think i prefer this to most of the other
places in boston because it's good, solid indian food but not
overpriced. the flavors aren't as distinct as bhindi bazaar, but
they're more savory, and the ambience is much better and the waitstaff
are very attentive.
diva (davis sq) is near the top of my list, out of
default. i've been a few times now, and the first time i was really
impressed with the flavours of the two dishes we tried, malai kofta
and a spicy bengali (?) vegetable dish. very spicy, but very good. the
appetizer we got, which was chopped up bits of the potato patty
appetizer in a yogurt sauce wasn't really to my liking, but not b/c it
was poorly prepared. since then i'd say that in general the food here
isn't spicy enough and the food tends to be mushy and the flavours
rather indistinct.
bhindi bazaar (corner of mass ave and newbury st) took over the
space my beloved himalaya (see above) used to be. the okra
dishes tend to be good, but about 1/2 of what i get there in general
is not really to my liking. the malai kofta is nice and spicy,
though. i find the decor to be annoying in the same way that island
pacific is, which is next door and possibly owned by the same
people.
average: kashmir, on newbury st. and gloucester, is
probably one of the better ones, but it's pretty mediocre and it can
be hit or miss. for example, one time i got the malai kofta and the
vegetable balls were nice and dry inside, and the next time i ordered
it and it was mushy all the way through and tasted like it had too
much tomatoes. (andy said it tasted like campbell's soup to him.) the
bhindi which was -really- greasy. the service was really subpar for a
place charging $15 for an entree, but the main drawback here is that
it's really over-priced, so you might as well go somewhere like
samraat that costs 1/2 as much and tastes about the same.
kebab 'n kurry, closed recently. it used to be across the
street from india samraat (see below) and also on mass. ave and
was marginally better than the other indian restaurants in the area.
the rest of the restaurants in this category are about on the same
level.
shalimar (central square): heavier than samraat, but maybe
stronger flavors. border india near the central square tosci's
got a glowing review from nadeau in the boston phoenix, and apparently
it specializes in the bengali region, so maybe i should try it
again.
despite its name, india quality in kenmore square is near the
bottom of the bunch in terms of quality, although it's cheaper and the
quantity per dish is greater than average.
don't bother: ragtoni near brighton, was really not worth going to again and prob. gets my pick for the worst indian restaurant of them all. one of the rare times i didn't like the indian food i was served. ajanta (145 first st. in cambridge, near the cambridgeside galleria) was also low quality. although it specialized in southern indian food, the food was surprisingly unappetizing.
verdict pending: i enjoyed tanjoor in h square the first time i went, but the second time i went it was definitely below average. bombay club, also in h square, was also pretty good, although not really memorable -- should prob. try that one again as well.
note: these commentaries are a little stilted b/c i'm
vegetarian. i.e. i make no comparisons about any of these places'
korean bbq, etc. generally i order a pajeon (korean scallion pancake)
and bibimbap (mixed vegetables w/ hot red sauce). i also generally
know what the chopjae (clear noodles with stir fried vegetables),
deokbeokki (spicy rice cakes), sun dubu ch'igae (spicy tofu stew), and
such are like.
compared to the 3 places i've been in new york (all of which were
quite good), i'd have to say that boston's korean eateries are
generally on a lower level. one last comment, for korean groceries,
check out lotte in central square (297 mass ave) which carries
some fresh made panchan (side dishes). now, on w/ the reviews ...
best:
*** suishaya (chinatown, 2 tyler st):
surprisingly good. i've been quite a few times now. the first time
wasn't so memorable, but i went again recently and it's prob. my
fav. of the korean restaurants i've been to lately. one of two korean
restaurants in chinatown.
good:
koreana (inman sq, 154 prospect st): just
reopened. the interior is nicer than it was, although our group of 4
ended up being seated right next to another group of 4 in an adjoining
table, which was sort of annoying. o/w pretty good, although i found
that i preferred suishaya. need to go again since they reopened.
buk kyung ii (allston): relatively new (opened around the fall
of 2003). owned by the same people who own the "hometown" restaurant
in somerville. when andy and i went to buk kyung ii i got something
that was vegetarian but very close to jjajjangmyeon and it was huge
and good. andy had cheopjae which was about average.
wuchan (union sq): usually near the top of most people's
list. went recently and was not overly impressed. the bibimbap i got
was sweet and didn't have anything particularly interesting in
it. the kimchi was sweet as well. not cheap either.
hometown restaurant (next to wuchan, in union sq): people call
this the jjajjang myeon place, b/c they're one of the few places in
boston that serve the korean (via china) black bean noodles. not bad,
but need to go again.
average:
choe's cafe (957 comm ave): nothing special,
but the waitress was better than average.
kaya (581 boylston st + 2 other locations): average. pissy
waitress. andy sez that kaya has one of the best renditions of
stir-fried kimchi in town. not very authentic. once i went w/ someone
who got the mandu and it looked nothing like korean mandu, it looked
much more chinese. similarly, the ch'igae there tastes right more or
less, but the vegetables it has in it are odd.
apollo (chinatown, 84-86 harrison ave): a little less than
average.
shilla (harvard sq): a little less than average.
not bad (cheaper alternatives):
seoul food (porter
sq, 1759 mass ave): i think this place is cheaper than average. the
panchan (side dishes) were really subpar, but the food was good.
super 88 (1095 comm ave): in a food court, so it's fast
foodish, but it's good.
porter exchange (porter sq): not bad. recently rehauled their
menu, and now has box dinners. about the same as the restaurant at
super 88.
eh:
q-vin (545 boylston st): def. below average. the
deok beokki and their kochujang (red bean paste) were really really
sweet, i.e. not very good.
jae's (locations on columbus and also in inman): okay for what
it is, i guess, which is overpriced, uber-americanzied generic pan-asian
food. but why bother when you can get the real thing?
a month or so ago andy and i checked out cambridge, 1, the gourmet pizza place that recently opened near the border cafe in harvard square. this is the place that's owned by the same people who own the miracle of science and audubon circle. (i got tired of not knowing their names, so i found a review from the globe of the pizza place .... their names are chris lutes and matthew curtis.) the decor is definitely very similar to the miracle and audubon, lots of wood and dark walls. this place only had pizza and salads (i.e. no sandwiches or pastas), which i find a drawback although i suppose that's a matter of opinion. andy liked that the back faces a cemetery, although i think that's a little on the weird side. the pizza we got was pretty good but not extraordinary. also, i find it annoying that they have a comma in their name, heh.
all in all going to both of these pizza places just reminded me of my preference for a nice greasy slice of american pizza from a place like nicole's on tremont. also, worth mentioning, although i hate bertucci's pizza i have to say their bruschetta is tops and i'd go back there just so i could have it. they put together a plate with six pieces of bread, three different toppings, one eggplant based, one tomato based, and i forget what the third one is. yummmm.
pho pasteur: pretty good and relatively cheap asian food. it's been a while, but i remember the one in harvard square being much better than the one on newbury st. there's a place in chinatown w/ the same name, but the food is quite different and i'm not sure if it's by the same people.
wisteria house (on newbury st. between faifield and gloucester): taiwanese food. the food's a bit lighter than most places, but overall it's not that great.
island hopper (on mass ave near newbury). pan-asian. went recently just b/c we never go there. i was reminded of why. the service was wicked slow, but the food was okay. actually, by coincidence we had the exact same thing i'd gotten from penang in chinatown a couple of weeks ago w/ my sister and cousin: mango chicken and a tofu curry. of course the island hopper version wasn't as good, but the main drawback to this place is that it's overpriced. in boston there's either cheap fast food places or higher end places with nothing in between. grrr.
shabu-zen (16 tyler st in chinatown) is a bit more than a year old and is shabu-shabu all the time. shabu-shabu is "the latest Asian food fad to sweep through California". basically it involves cooking your own meat and veggies in a boiling broth. this boston.com review is a good intro to what it's all about. i had the vegetarian version and it was pretty good (although in retrospect i think it came w/ fish balls), although it's definitely more one of those places like fire and ice where the food isn't that exciting but where it's good to take a date or people from out of town to.
miracle of science (mass ave between central square and MIT): good veggie burger. comes w/ these really good fried potatoes.
other side cafe (newbury st, corner diagonal from virgin records): open until 1 a.m. ... aw, yeah
... they have a vegetarian chili i like
bread and circus: has two pretty good salad bars, although pricey, and some other portable foods, inc. decent sushi.
the wrap: chain. pretty good, although super heavy, cheap, and portable food. you prob. won't be able to go there more than once every few months, though.
flour (washington near mass ave): overrated. good soup, but the bread in their sandwiches and their pastries are always way too heavy. andy likes their quiches.
au bon pain: yeah, i know they're a chain. their fields and feta wrap, custom sandwiches, and pastries are pretty good
audubon circle (green line near the st. catherine's stop): bar/restaurant by the same people who do miracle of science. nice ambience and pretty good food. the vegetarian bean burger tends to be mushy, though.
parish cafe (boylston st.): hadn't realized that their gimmick was to have sandwiches "created" by local area chefs. none of which were vegetarian (surprise). got the ravioli, which was pretty good, maybe even worth getting again. it was surprisingly crispy, which was novel. i wonder if that was related in any way to the st. louis baked ravioli (winnie sez the correct term is "toasted" even though it's not really toasted. it is breaded, though).
garden of eden (tremont st in the south end): yet another one of those places that andy and i haven't been to in a while and for good reason. we tried it for breakfast and we were both quite disappointed. the service was as bad as we remembered, and literally all they had was eggs, omelettes, toast, granola, and pastries. no bacon, no pancakes, nada. also, since when do you get plain toast and have to ask for butter and jam? that's just pathetic.
francesca's (south end on tremont): too many "pretty" boys, and the food is pretty unremarkable.
zuma (fanueil hall): generic, americanized mexican food. not
bad if that's what you're in the mood for.
cafe jaffa (gloucester st in between boylston and newbury) one of my favorite middle eastern places in boston (much, much better than steve's down the street). the falafel is nice and crunchy on the outside which i like. the grape leaves are also nice and lemony, although their hummus wasn't garlicky enough to our taste. also has these things called bourekas which are bready on the outside and a mashed potato mixture on the inside, which are all right.
nicole's (tremont closer to mass ave): has a decent vegetarian plate with hummus, baba ghanoush, falafel, tahini, and a salad
burrito max (kenmore square). they have a pretty good "barbeque tofu" burrito. last time i went though (6/2004) i forgot to ask for salsa. grr. also, the sweet potato fries i got were totally soggy. good every once in a while.
casa romero (gloucester st in between comm ave and newbury) ): overpriced mexican place. last time andy and i went it was one of those "let's check it out even though last time we went it was really mediocre" kind of occasions. it was better, although i'd forgotten how way overpriced it is. we started w/ the guacamole which was quite bland. then we had three appetizers: a cactus/mexican mushroom (i forget the name) dish in a tortilla; a poblano quesadilla which had a nice zing to it; and the chile relleno. all three were fine although none of them were amazing. the service was definitely subpar, but that might just be the "latin way".
red sea (tremont in the south end near metropolis etc.): one of the few ethiopian restaurants in boston. it's called i've been to the other ethiopian place in central square and from what i remember from the other place i liked this place marginally better b/c the bread was less sour. andy and i agree that ethiopian food just isn't that interesting. some of the spices are tasty, but everything has the same texture, sort of pureed and only slightly chewy.
sultan's kitchen (in the financial district): per winnie's strong recommendation andy and i checked out sultan's kitchen. i had the artichoke fritters, andy had some falafel and hummus. the flavors were quite good, although with all fried food that's not directly out of the fryer, it was rather too greasy and dense. i like my falafel to be crunchy on the outside, and so far cafe jaffa in the back bay is my favorite in boston, although there used to be a food truck that served similarly good falafel. went to cafe jaffa this week and although their falafel is pretty good i feel there must be better out there ... their grape leaves though are still the best i've had in boston, although their baba ghanoush is curiously without a strong taste.
metropolis cafe (south end on tremont st): 9/2004: went after a fairly long hiatus. either they were having a really off night, or they've gone really downhill; i'm inclined to think the latter. i can say w/ out reserve that our meal at metropolis was one of the weirdest meals i've ever had. weird as in not in a good way. andy started with an arugula salad that for no particular reason came shredded and molded in a circular shape reminescent of dog food just out of a can and had what appeared to be a canned piece of mandarin orange and a half-frozen hunk of goat cheese on the top. meanwhile, i was puzzling over the asparagus "tartare" which didn't taste much of anything let alone asparagus and which also inexplicably came molded. andy's rabbit was prepared like chicken and was dry and overcooked. it came with the weirdest gnocchi i've ever encountered. engorged, mushy, and unappetizing. i hate to say it, but it strongly called to mind fat, old maggots found under a damp log. also devoid of taste. my "napolean" was described as being "like a lasagna but with bread instead of pasta". it came w/ a squash puree, but like pretty much everything else we'd gotten it was similarly tasteless, although every once in a while i would come across a bit of olive. it's kind of sad when the only good thing you can say about the food is, "well, the bread and the olive oil were pretty good."
2003: the first time i went andy got a simple salad and the veal scallopini, which he said was pretty good. it came w/ this vegetable gratin which is what i had. i'd get it again. it had potatoes, leeks, and cauliflower w/ asiago cheese on top. very filling and nicely done, not heavy. i also had a terrine which came with a salad. the terrine was mostly artichoke, goat cheese, and spinach. it was good, but i didn't find it to be particularly noteworthy. the wait for our food was -really- long, but it must have just been the time we were there (prob. got there around 7 on a sat.) b/c the people who came after us seemed to get their food pretty quickly. the second time i went i got the potato dish again but found it much less interesting the second time around.
thai village (592 tremont st): a last resort place (b/c the south end doesn't have that many asian places), but avoid if at all possible b/c to be quite honest it's really horrible horrible. boston has a lot of thai restaurants, and i can say that honestly i've been to most of them. this has got to be the worst place for thai food i've ever been. that includes any mall food court thai food i've ever had. now there are certainly a lot of thai restaurants in boston that offer mediocre food, but i think thai village is one of the few eateries in boston, thai or no, that has food that i can hardly finish. i've been there twice, both as a last resort, and both times the food i got was really terrible. the curry i got most recently was absolutely devoid of flavor, and it was watery. as in watered down watery. as in, am i eating colored water or is this supposed to be a curry? avoid at all costs. the weirdest thing is that i checked online out of curiosity to see what other places thought of it, including citysearch, the phoenix, and boston.com, and they all gave this place average reviews. are they crazy?? maybe the reviews are all outdated. anyway ...
trident's (on newbury st): has more of a wider menu than the other side, but the food here is pretty inedible. you'd be better off making mac 'n cheese from a box.
mike's city diner (washington st., south end). i agree w/ winnie on this one. it had an odd mix of people when andy and i went on a saturday morning, but the food was pretty mediocre. i had the blueberry pancakes which were fine but the home fries were pretty tasteless. the waitresses there are quintessentially diner waitresses though, which is always cool. makes you feel like you're in the middle of nowhere in idaho.